So, you have identified students needing a support plan, created goals, selected and implemented appropriate interventions, and collected data using a progress monitoring tool or assessment. Fantastic! These are all necessary steps to supporting students through your Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS).
But, NOW WHAT? How do you know if the intervention is actually “working”?
In my career as an instructional coach helping teachers implement intervention plans with struggling students, it all came down to the data. The starting point was setting Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Timebound, or SMART, goals. This helped us determine what specific data to consider and the criteria for success.
Part of this work is about determining the “just right” level of intervention, and like Goldilocks, there is a time to make adjustments. Just as Goldilocks collected data along the way to find what worked for her, with an intervention plan, there will be adjustments as data is collected.
The right set of questions can help you and your MTSS support team make informed decisions about student progress and next steps. This collaborative practice also helps determine effective instructional practices and interventions for the future.
It is a best practice to gather at least three progress monitoring data points before the plan is reviewed for effectiveness. Why three? Because after three data points are gathered, it is possible to calculate a trend line that shows the Rate of Improvement (ROI) that allows us to see how the student is growing in the specific skill. If growth is uncertain based on the three data points, wait for more data points before making any decisions.
Keep in mind that the data may vary and be higher and lower than the goal line due to a variety of factors, including testing environment, the time of day the student is monitored for progress, fatigue or illness, etc. For example, if the student is taking the assessment in a classroom versus in a quiet library, or before lunch versus after lunch, the student might perform differently. For this reason, more data is better! At the same time, you don’t want to wait too long if the intervention isn’t providing what the student needs.
TIP: Strike a “just right” balance of data collection — not too much and not too little — and be sure that your progress monitoring tools are standards-aligned and based on the skill and goal area in need of improvement. |
As you look at the progress monitoring data, what is it telling you? Calculate the Rate of Improvement (ROI) to visually analyze the progress a student is making toward their identified SMART goal. An MTSS software platform such as Branching Minds makes it easy to see this trend line along with the goal line to identify whether a student is responding to intervention. If the student’s ROI is at or above the goal line, then the student is on track to meet the goal.
Rate of Improvement Showing Sufficient Growth
See the charts below for guidance when making decisions about student progress with Tier 2 or Tier 3 plans:
Guidance for Tier 2 Decision Rules:
Performance Level |
Growth/Rate of Improvement |
Decision |
3 consecutive PM data points at or above 25th percentile goal line |
Sufficient Growth |
Move to Tier 1: Discontinue or fade out Tier 2 targeted small-group instruction |
PM data consistently between 10-25th percentile |
Sufficient Growth |
Stay in Tier 2: Maintain the current Tier 2 targeted small-group instruction for another cycle |
Uncertain Growth |
Stay in Tier 2: Revise the current Tier 2 targeted small-group instruction and implement for another cycle |
|
4 consecutive PM data points between 0-9th percentile |
Uncertain or Insufficient Growth |
Move to Tier 3: Increase intervention intensity to reflect Tier 3 level of support and implement for another intervention cycle |
Performance Level |
Growth/Rate of Improvement |
Decision |
3 consecutive PM data points at or above 10th percentile |
Sufficient Growth |
Move to Tier 2: Revise plan to reflect Tier 2 targeted small-group instruction, and implement for another cycle |
PM data consistently below 10th percentile |
Sufficient Growth |
Stay in Tier 3: Maintain the current Tier 3 intervention for another cycle |
Uncertain Growth |
Stay in Tier 3: Revise the current Tier 3 intervention and implement for another intervention cycle |
|
Insufficient Growth |
Consider Special Ed Referral: Review criteria and schedule referral meeting with team and parents |
*The “percentile” represents the comparison of the student’s growth to what is average for the grade level.
➡️ Related Resource: How To Use Progress Monitoring Data To Guide Decision-Making in an MTSS Practice
Before adjusting plans, each component of the plan should be analyzed. Below are some considerations given each piece of the plan:
TIP: In my work as an instructional specialist, our team gave at least six weeks to implement before deciding whether the plan worked for the student, but I found it very helpful to directly observe students with our interventionists and offer feedback on their intervention implementation throughout that 6-week period. Observing the intervention in progress allowed me to see what was working and what small adjustments might be needed. |
Regardless of the type of intervention or progress monitoring tools used, an objective look at the data should be the guiding factor in making decisions about the effectiveness of an intervention plan. A problem-solving team that meets consistently to analyze data will be able to understand what is working in an intervention plan and what needs to be adjusted.
Be a ‘Goldilocks” with your adjustments—intervention plans are meant to be about finding the “just right” support to help the student make progress, and the Rate of Improvement provides an objective guideline for these adjustments.
The data gathered through the MTSS process provides the best means of evaluating success, but gathering and analyzing this data can be confusing and time-consuming. Branching Minds helps educators get clarity and save time by doing the data tracking and analysis for you. Check out this on-demand webinar recording, on progress monitoring in RTI/MTSS along with this MTSS Data Analysis Worksheet.
RELATED RESOURCES:
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
|
Interested in discovering how you can efficiently create, monitor, and adjust student learning plans with Branching Minds?
|
|
Lisa Fik is a Consultant with Branching Minds with 13+ years as an educator at the middle school level. With experience in large public schools, a small public charter school, and an international school in Shanghai, China, Lisa has supported an array of diverse learners. As an instructional coach, she has supported teachers in math for grades 5-8, Algebra 1, and Geometry. As a classroom teacher, she has taught grades 6th-8th and Algebra 1. As an instructional coach, she built an MTSS program from the ground up supporting sixth graders in math. In addition, Lisa has supported site, district, and network professional development to support the mission and vision of network goals. Lisa holds a Bachelor of Science from Illinois State University in middle level education (specializing in math and English), a Master of Science from National University in Applied School Leadership, and a preliminary administrative credential.
Tagged: MTSS Practice, Interventions and Learning Supports' Strategies
Comments (0)